Learn how Autumn and Paymenter differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these subscription & billing management tools is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
9 days agoRepository age
2 yearsLicense
Apache-2.0Repository
useautumn/autumn
Last 30 days
Last commit
10 hours agoRepository age
4 yearsVersion
v1.5.9License
MITSelf-hosted
YesRepository
paymenter/paymenter
Paymenter appears to have several advantages over Autumn, particularly in growth, maturity, licensing and features. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Both Autumn and Paymenter show comparable community engagement with 2,832 and 2,813 stars respectively. In terms of developer contributions, Paymenter has 566 forks, indicating moderate developer engagement.
Paymenter is growing faster, adding 414 stars in the last 30 days (+17%) against adding 96 stars for Autumn (+3.5%). Paymenter is the smaller project of the two, so it is closing the gap rather than extending a lead.
Both projects show recent activity, with Autumn last updated 9 days ago and Paymenter 10 hours ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Bash. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Autumn uses Typescript, JSX, Python, Next.js, Lua while Paymenter leverages PHP, Laravel.
Paymenter has been in development longer, starting 4 years ago, compared to Autumn which began 2 years ago. This 2.3-year head start suggests Paymenter may have more mature features and established processes.
Paymenter uses the MIT license, which is more permissive than Autumn's Apache-2.0 license, potentially offering greater flexibility for commercial use and integration.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Subscription & Billing Management. However, they also have distinct specializations: Paymenter extends into Payment Infrastructure.
Paymenter provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while Autumn may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.