Learn how Formance and Paymenter differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these payment infrastructure tools is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Repository

Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Paymenter appears to have several advantages over Formance, particularly in popularity, growth and features. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Paymenter significantly outpaces Formance in community adoption with 2,275 stars compared to 521 stars on GitHub. This 4.4x difference suggests Paymenter has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Paymenter has 489 forks, indicating moderate developer engagement.
Paymenter is growing faster, adding 114 stars in the last 30 days (+5.3%) against adding 5 stars for Formance (+1%). Paymenter is both larger and pulling further ahead.
Both projects show recent activity, with Formance last updated 3 days ago and Paymenter 13 hours ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Formance uses Golang while Paymenter leverages CSS, Bash, PHP, Laravel.
Both projects started around the same time, with Formance beginning 4 years ago and Paymenter 4 years ago.
Both projects use the MIT license, providing identical terms for usage and distribution.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Payment Infrastructure. However, they also have distinct specializations: Formance also focuses on Fintech Infrastructure while Paymenter extends into Subscription & Billing Management.
Paymenter provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while Formance may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.