Learn how Meteroid and Paymenter differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these subscription & billing management tools is best for you.
Last 30 days

Last 30 days
Last commit
1 day agoRepository age
4 yearsVersion
v1.5.9License
MITSelf-hosted
YesRepository
paymenter/paymenter
Paymenter appears to have several advantages over Meteroid, particularly in popularity, growth and licensing. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Paymenter leads in popularity with 2,831 stars vs 1,355 stars for Meteroid. The 109% higher star count indicates stronger community adoption. In terms of developer contributions, Paymenter has 572 forks, indicating moderate developer engagement.
Paymenter is growing faster, adding 413 stars in the last 30 days (+17%) against adding 34 stars for Meteroid (+2.6%). Paymenter is both larger and pulling further ahead.
Both projects show recent activity, with Meteroid last updated 2 days ago and Paymenter 1 day ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Bash. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Meteroid uses Typescript, JSX, SCSS, Rust while Paymenter leverages PHP, Laravel.
Both projects started around the same time, with Meteroid beginning 3 years ago and Paymenter 4 years ago.
Paymenter uses the MIT license, which is more permissive than Meteroid's AGPL-3.0 license, potentially offering greater flexibility for commercial use and integration.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Subscription & Billing Management. However, they also have distinct specializations: Paymenter extends into Payment Infrastructure.
Both Meteroid and Paymenter offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.