Learn how Midori Browser and Waterfox differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these tools is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Repository

Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
Repository

Both Midori Browser and Waterfox have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Waterfox significantly outpaces Midori Browser in community adoption with 6,189 stars compared to 385 stars on GitHub. This 16.1x difference suggests Waterfox has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Waterfox has 426 forks, indicating moderate developer engagement.
Midori Browser is growing faster, adding 25 stars in the last 30 days (+6.9%) against adding 128 stars for Waterfox (+2.1%). Midori Browser is the smaller project of the two, so it is closing the gap rather than extending a lead.
Both projects show recent activity, with Midori Browser last updated 6 hours ago and Waterfox 5 days ago.
Waterfox has been in development longer, starting 12 years ago, compared to Midori Browser which began 3 years ago. This 9.1-year head start suggests Waterfox may have more mature features and established processes.
Midori Browser is licensed under MPL-2.0, while Waterfox's license terms are not publicly specified.
Midori Browser also focuses on Web Browsers.