Learn how Helium and Waterfox differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these web browsers is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
2 days agoRepository age
2 yearsVersion
0.20.1License
GPL-3.0Repository
imputnet/helium
Last 30 days
Last commit
7 hours agoRepository age
12 yearsVersion
6.7.6Repository
waterfox
Helium appears to have several advantages over Waterfox, particularly in popularity, growth and licensing. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Helium significantly outpaces Waterfox in community adoption with 22,033 stars compared to 6,398 stars on GitHub. This 3.4x difference suggests Helium has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Helium has 659 forks, indicating moderate developer engagement.
Helium is growing faster, adding 1,048 stars in the last 30 days (+5%) against adding 85 stars for Waterfox (+1.3%). Helium is both larger and pulling further ahead.
Both projects show recent activity, with Helium last updated 2 days ago and Waterfox 7 hours ago.
Waterfox has been in development longer, starting 12 years ago, compared to Helium which began 2 years ago. This 10.5-year head start suggests Waterfox may have more mature features and established processes.
Helium is licensed under GPL-3.0, while Waterfox's license terms are not publicly specified.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Web Browsers.