Ad
Capture – Capture screenshots, generate PDFs, scrape content, extract metadata, and automate browsers with one API.Learn More
Capture – Capture screenshots, generate PDFs, scrape content, extract metadata, and automate browsers with one API.Capture – Capture screenshots, generate PDFs, scrape content, extract metadata, and automate browsers with one API.Learn how Helium and Waterfox differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these tools is best for you.
Both Helium and Waterfox have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Helium significantly outpaces Waterfox in community adoption with 19,117 stars compared to 6,101 stars on GitHub. This 3.1x difference suggests Helium has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Helium has 517 forks, indicating moderate developer engagement.
Both projects show recent activity, with Helium last updated 13 hours ago and Waterfox 14 hours ago.
Waterfox has been in development longer, starting 12 years ago, compared to Helium which began 1 year ago. This 10.5-year head start suggests Waterfox may have more mature features and established processes.
Helium is licensed under GPL-3.0, while Waterfox's license terms are not publicly specified.
Helium also focuses on Security & Privacy, Web Browsers.
Heliumvs
BraveActivity score
Stars
Forks
Last commit
Activity score
Stars
Forks
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Repository
Repository
