Learn how Helium and Waterfox differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these tools is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Repository

Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
Repository

Helium appears to have several advantages over Waterfox, particularly in popularity, growth and licensing. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Helium significantly outpaces Waterfox in community adoption with 19,849 stars compared to 6,189 stars on GitHub. This 3.2x difference suggests Helium has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Helium has 546 forks, indicating moderate developer engagement.
Helium is growing faster, adding 1,008 stars in the last 30 days (+5.4%) against adding 128 stars for Waterfox (+2.1%). Helium is both larger and pulling further ahead.
Both projects show recent activity, with Helium last updated 16 hours ago and Waterfox 5 days ago.
Waterfox has been in development longer, starting 12 years ago, compared to Helium which began 2 years ago. This 10.5-year head start suggests Waterfox may have more mature features and established processes.
Helium is licensed under GPL-3.0, while Waterfox's license terms are not publicly specified.
Helium also focuses on Security & Privacy, Web Browsers.