Learn how Helium and Zen Browser differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these web browsers is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
18 hours agoRepository age
2 yearsVersion
0.20.3License
GPL-3.0Repository
imputnet/helium
Last 30 days
Last commit
11 hours agoRepository age
3 yearsVersion
1.24License
MPL-2.0Repository
zen-browser/desktop
Both Helium and Zen Browser have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Zen Browser leads in popularity with 45,517 stars vs 22,283 stars for Helium. The 104% higher star count indicates stronger community adoption. In terms of developer contributions, Zen Browser has 1,946 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Helium is growing faster, adding 1,109 stars in the last 30 days (+5.2%) against adding 798 stars for Zen Browser (+1.8%). Helium is the smaller project of the two, so it is closing the gap rather than extending a lead.
Both projects show recent activity, with Helium last updated 18 hours ago and Zen Browser 11 hours ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, Bash, Python. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Zen Browser leverages CSS, Typescript, Rust, C, Objective-C, C++.
Both projects started around the same time, with Helium beginning 2 years ago and Zen Browser 3 years ago.
The projects use different licenses: Helium is licensed under GPL-3.0 while Zen Browser uses MPL-2.0. Consider the licensing requirements when choosing for your project.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Web Browsers.
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs