Learn how Flow and Zen Browser differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these web browsers is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
5 months agoRepository age
2 yearsVersion
v0.12.0License
GPL-3.0Repository
flow-browser
Last 30 days
Last commit
11 hours agoRepository age
3 yearsVersion
1.24License
MPL-2.0Repository
zen-browser/desktop
Zen Browser appears to have several advantages over Flow, particularly in popularity, growth and activity. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Zen Browser significantly outpaces Flow in community adoption with 45,517 stars compared to 1,092 stars on GitHub. This 41.7x difference suggests Zen Browser has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Zen Browser has 1,946 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Zen Browser is growing faster, adding 798 stars in the last 30 days (+1.8%) against adding 14 stars for Flow (+1.3%). Zen Browser is both larger and pulling further ahead.
Zen Browser shows more recent development activity with its last commit 11 hours ago, while Flow was last updated 5 months ago. This suggests Zen Browser is being more actively maintained.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Typescript. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Flow uses JSX while Zen Browser leverages Bash, Python, Rust, C, Objective-C, C++.
Both projects started around the same time, with Flow beginning 2 years ago and Zen Browser 3 years ago.
The projects use different licenses: Flow is licensed under GPL-3.0 while Zen Browser uses MPL-2.0. Consider the licensing requirements when choosing for your project.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Web Browsers.
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs