Learn how Flow and Zen Browser differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these web browsers is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Repository

Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Repository

Zen Browser appears to have several advantages over Flow, particularly in popularity and activity. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Zen Browser significantly outpaces Flow in community adoption with 44,561 stars compared to 1,076 stars on GitHub. This 41.4x difference suggests Zen Browser has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Zen Browser has 1,770 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Flow and Zen Browser are moving at much the same rate, adding 10 stars and adding 493 stars respectively over the last 30 days (+0.9% vs +1.1%). Neither is pulling away from the other on momentum alone.
Zen Browser shows more recent development activity with its last commit 13 hours ago, while Flow was last updated 4 months ago. This suggests Zen Browser is being more actively maintained.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Typescript. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Flow uses JSX while Zen Browser leverages Bash, Python, Rust, C, Objective-C, C++.
Both projects started around the same time, with Flow beginning 2 years ago and Zen Browser 2 years ago.
The projects use different licenses: Flow is licensed under GPL-3.0 while Zen Browser uses MPL-2.0. Consider the licensing requirements when choosing for your project.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Web Browsers. However, they also have distinct specializations: Zen Browser extends into Security & Privacy.