Learn how Flow and Helium differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these web browsers is best for you.
Helium appears to have several advantages over Flow, particularly in popularity and activity. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Helium significantly outpaces Flow in community adoption with 18,783 stars compared to 1,049 stars on GitHub. This 17.9x difference suggests Helium has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Helium has 497 forks, indicating moderate developer engagement.
Helium shows more recent development activity with its last commit 13 hours ago, while Flow was last updated 2 months ago. This suggests Helium is being more actively maintained.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Flow uses CSS, Typescript, JSX while Helium leverages Bash, Python.
Both projects started around the same time, with Flow beginning 1 year ago and Helium 1 year ago.
Both projects use the GPL-3.0 license, providing identical terms for usage and distribution.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Web Browsers. However, they also have distinct specializations: Helium extends into Security & Privacy.
Flowvs
BraveActivity score
Stars
Forks
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Repository
Activity score
Stars
Forks
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Repository
Sent – A unified API for sending messages across SMS, RCS, and apps like WhatsApp.
