What is the main difference between Flow and Waterfox?

Flow and Waterfox are both open source tools but differ in their approach, features, and target audience. Compare their GitHub stats, technology stack, and community adoption to make the best choice.

Which is better: Flow or Waterfox?

The choice between Flow and Waterfox depends on your specific needs, technical requirements, and team preferences. Both are quality open source solutions with active communities.

Can I migrate from Flow to Waterfox?

Migration between Flow and Waterfox is possible but requires careful planning. Consider data export/import capabilities, feature parity, and potential workflow changes.

InfluxDB – The purpose-built time series platform for high-velocity ingestion and real-time queries at scale.

Learn More

Flow vs Waterfox

Learn how Flow and Waterfox differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these tools is best for you.

Flow

A modern browser combining minimalist design with smart features like profiles, spaces, and command palette. Full Chrome extension support and privacy-focused browsing.

Visit Flow Read more

1,066stars+15(+1.4%)

Last 30 days

Last commit
3 months ago
Repository age
1 year
Version
v0.12.0
License
GPL-3.0
Repository
multiboxlabs/flow-browser

Waterfox

Firefox-based browser with built-in ad blocking, oblivious DNS, zero telemetry, tree-style tabs, and no AI features sending your data anywhere.

Visit Waterfox Read more

6,189stars+128(+2.1%)

Last 30 days

Last commit
5 days ago
Repository age
12 years
Version
6.7.0
Repository
browserworks/waterfox

Detailed Comparison

Waterfox appears to have several advantages over Flow, particularly in popularity, growth, activity and maturity. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.

Waterfox wins

Community & Popularity

Waterfox significantly outpaces Flow in community adoption with 6,189 stars compared to 1,066 stars on GitHub. This 5.8x difference suggests Waterfox has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Waterfox has 426 forks, indicating moderate developer engagement.

Waterfox wins

Growth Momentum

Waterfox is growing faster, adding 128 stars in the last 30 days (+2.1%) against adding 15 stars for Flow (+1.4%). Waterfox is both larger and pulling further ahead.

Waterfox wins

Development Activity

Waterfox shows more recent development activity with its last commit 5 days ago, while Flow was last updated 3 months ago. This suggests Waterfox is being more actively maintained.

Waterfox wins

Project Maturity

Waterfox has been in development longer, starting 12 years ago, compared to Flow which began 1 year ago. This 10.6-year head start suggests Waterfox may have more mature features and established processes.

Flow wins