Learn how LibreWolf and Waterfox differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these web browsers is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
1 day agoRepository age
3 yearsRepository
librewolf/source
Last 30 days
Last commit
7 days agoRepository age
12 yearsVersion
6.7.7Repository
waterfox
Both LibreWolf and Waterfox have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, maturity and features when making your decision.
Waterfox significantly outpaces LibreWolf in community adoption with 6,344 stars compared to 1,359 stars on GitHub. This 4.7x difference suggests Waterfox has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Waterfox has 438 forks, indicating moderate developer engagement.
LibreWolf is growing faster, adding 24 stars in the last 30 days (+1.8%) against adding 9 stars for Waterfox (+0.1%). LibreWolf is the smaller project of the two, so it is closing the gap rather than extending a lead.
Both projects show recent activity, with LibreWolf last updated 1 day ago and Waterfox 7 days ago.
Waterfox has been in development longer, starting 12 years ago, compared to LibreWolf which began 3 years ago. This 9.0-year head start suggests Waterfox may have more mature features and established processes.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Web Browsers.
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs