Learn how LibreWolf and Waterfox differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these tools is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Repository

Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
Repository

Both LibreWolf and Waterfox have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity and maturity when making your decision.
Waterfox significantly outpaces LibreWolf in community adoption with 6,310 stars compared to 1,332 stars on GitHub. This 4.7x difference suggests Waterfox has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Waterfox has 431 forks, indicating moderate developer engagement.
LibreWolf is growing faster, adding 31 stars in the last 30 days (+2.4%) against adding 124 stars for Waterfox (+2%). LibreWolf is the smaller project of the two, so it is closing the gap rather than extending a lead.
Both projects show recent activity, with LibreWolf last updated 5 hours ago and Waterfox 1 day ago.
Waterfox has been in development longer, starting 12 years ago, compared to LibreWolf which began 3 years ago. This 9.0-year head start suggests Waterfox may have more mature features and established processes.
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs