Learn how LibreWolf and Waterfox differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these tools is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Repository

Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
Repository

Waterfox appears to have several advantages over LibreWolf, particularly in popularity, growth and maturity. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity and maturity when making your decision.
Waterfox significantly outpaces LibreWolf in community adoption with 6,242 stars compared to 1,310 stars on GitHub. This 4.8x difference suggests Waterfox has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Waterfox has 428 forks, indicating moderate developer engagement.
Waterfox is growing faster, adding 141 stars in the last 30 days (+2.3%) against adding 22 stars for LibreWolf (+1.7%). Waterfox is both larger and pulling further ahead.
Both projects show recent activity, with LibreWolf last updated 1 day ago and Waterfox 7 days ago.
Waterfox has been in development longer, starting 12 years ago, compared to LibreWolf which began 3 years ago. This 9.0-year head start suggests Waterfox may have more mature features and established processes.