Learn how Brave and LibreWolf differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these web browsers is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
12 hours agoRepository age
9 yearsVersion
v1.98.63License
MPL-2.0Repository
brave/brave-browser
Last 30 days
Last commit
1 day agoRepository age
3 yearsRepository
librewolf/source
Brave appears to have several advantages over LibreWolf, particularly in popularity, maturity and licensing. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Brave significantly outpaces LibreWolf in community adoption with 24,079 stars compared to 1,359 stars on GitHub. This 17.7x difference suggests Brave has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Brave has 3,263 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
LibreWolf is growing faster, adding 24 stars in the last 30 days (+1.8%) against adding 289 stars for Brave (+1.2%). LibreWolf is the smaller project of the two, so it is closing the gap rather than extending a lead.
Both projects show recent activity, with Brave last updated 12 hours ago and LibreWolf 1 day ago.
Brave has been in development longer, starting 9 years ago, compared to LibreWolf which began 3 years ago. This 5.9-year head start suggests Brave may have more mature features and established processes.
Brave is licensed under MPL-2.0, while LibreWolf's license terms are not publicly specified.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Web Browsers.