Ad
 
Learn More

Ladybird vs LibreWolf

Learn how Ladybird and LibreWolf differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these tools is best for you.

vs
Favicon of Ladybird

Ladybird

Open source web browser with its own engine, built from scratch without Blink, WebKit, or Gecko. Non-profit backed, no search deals, no user monetization.
65,986stars+1,241(+1.9%)

Last 30 days

Sponsor Ladybird onopencollective.com
Screenshot of Ladybird
Favicon of LibreWolf

LibreWolf

A Firefox-based browser that strips telemetry, blocks trackers, disables DRM, and ships with a content blocker out of the box.
1,310stars+22(+1.7%)

Last 30 days

Screenshot of LibreWolf

Detailed Comparison

Ladybird appears to have several advantages over LibreWolf, particularly in popularity and licensing. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.

Ladybird wins
Community & Popularity

Ladybird significantly outpaces LibreWolf in community adoption with 65,986 stars compared to 1,310 stars on GitHub. This 50.4x difference suggests Ladybird has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Ladybird has 3,142 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.

Comparable
Growth Momentum

Ladybird and LibreWolf are moving at much the same rate, adding 1,241 stars and adding 22 stars respectively over the last 30 days (+1.9% vs +1.7%). Neither is pulling away from the other on momentum alone.

Comparable
Development Activity

Both projects show recent activity, with Ladybird last updated 13 hours ago and LibreWolf 1 day ago.

Comparable
Project Maturity

Both projects started around the same time, with Ladybird beginning 2 years ago and LibreWolf 3 years ago.

Ladybird wins
Licensing

Ladybird is licensed under BSD-2-Clause, while LibreWolf's license terms are not publicly specified.

Comparable
Use Cases & Features

Ladybird also focuses on Web Browsers.