Learn More

Ladybird vs LibreWolf

Learn how Ladybird and LibreWolf differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these tools is best for you.

vs
Favicon of Ladybird

Ladybird

Open source web browser with its own engine, built from scratch without Blink, WebKit, or Gecko. Non-profit backed, no search deals, no user monetization.
66,285stars+471(+0.7%)

Last 30 days

Sponsor Ladybird onopencollective.com
Screenshot of Ladybird
Favicon of LibreWolf

LibreWolf

A Firefox-based browser that strips telemetry, blocks trackers, disables DRM, and ships with a content blocker out of the box.
1,332stars+31(+2.4%)

Last 30 days

Screenshot of LibreWolf

Detailed Comparison

Both Ladybird and LibreWolf have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.

Ladybird wins
Community & Popularity

Ladybird significantly outpaces LibreWolf in community adoption with 66,285 stars compared to 1,332 stars on GitHub. This 49.8x difference suggests Ladybird has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Ladybird has 3,165 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.

LibreWolf wins
Growth Momentum

LibreWolf is growing faster, adding 31 stars in the last 30 days (+2.4%) against adding 471 stars for Ladybird (+0.7%). LibreWolf is the smaller project of the two, so it is closing the gap rather than extending a lead.

Comparable
Development Activity

Both projects show recent activity, with Ladybird last updated 4 hours ago and LibreWolf 5 hours ago.

Comparable
Project Maturity

Both projects started around the same time, with Ladybird beginning 2 years ago and LibreWolf 3 years ago.

Ladybird wins
Licensing

Ladybird is licensed under BSD-2-Clause, while LibreWolf's license terms are not publicly specified.

Comparable
Use Cases & Features

Ladybird also focuses on Web Browsers.