Learn how Ladybird and LibreWolf differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these web browsers is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
8 hours agoRepository age
2 yearsLicense
BSD-2-ClauseRepository
ladybird
Last 30 days
Last commit
1 day agoRepository age
3 yearsRepository
librewolf/source
Both Ladybird and LibreWolf have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Ladybird significantly outpaces LibreWolf in community adoption with 66,807 stars compared to 1,359 stars on GitHub. This 49.2x difference suggests Ladybird has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Ladybird has 3,194 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
LibreWolf is growing faster, adding 24 stars in the last 30 days (+1.8%) against adding 406 stars for Ladybird (+0.6%). LibreWolf is the smaller project of the two, so it is closing the gap rather than extending a lead.
Both projects show recent activity, with Ladybird last updated 8 hours ago and LibreWolf 1 day ago.
Both projects started around the same time, with Ladybird beginning 2 years ago and LibreWolf 3 years ago.
Ladybird is licensed under BSD-2-Clause, while LibreWolf's license terms are not publicly specified.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Web Browsers.
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs