Ad
Learn more

Ladybird vs LibreWolf

Learn how Ladybird and LibreWolf differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these web browsers is best for you.

vs

Ladybird

Open source web browser with its own engine, built from scratch without Blink, WebKit, or Gecko. Non-profit backed, no search deals, no user monetization.
66,807stars+406(+0.6%)

Last 30 days

Screenshot of Ladybird

LibreWolf

A Firefox-based browser that strips telemetry, blocks trackers, disables DRM, and ships with a content blocker out of the box.
1,359stars+24(+1.8%)

Last 30 days

Screenshot of LibreWolf

Detailed Comparison

Both Ladybird and LibreWolf have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.

Ladybird wins
Community & Popularity

Ladybird significantly outpaces LibreWolf in community adoption with 66,807 stars compared to 1,359 stars on GitHub. This 49.2x difference suggests Ladybird has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Ladybird has 3,194 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.

LibreWolf wins
Growth Momentum

LibreWolf is growing faster, adding 24 stars in the last 30 days (+1.8%) against adding 406 stars for Ladybird (+0.6%). LibreWolf is the smaller project of the two, so it is closing the gap rather than extending a lead.

Comparable
Development Activity

Both projects show recent activity, with Ladybird last updated 8 hours ago and LibreWolf 1 day ago.

Comparable
Project Maturity

Both projects started around the same time, with Ladybird beginning 2 years ago and LibreWolf 3 years ago.

Ladybird wins
Licensing

Ladybird is licensed under BSD-2-Clause, while LibreWolf's license terms are not publicly specified.

Comparable
Use Cases & Features

Both tools serve similar use cases in Web Browsers.