Learn how Helium and LibreWolf differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these web browsers is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
18 hours agoRepository age
2 yearsVersion
0.20.3License
GPL-3.0Repository
imputnet/helium
Last 30 days
Last commit
1 day agoRepository age
3 yearsRepository
librewolf/source
Helium appears to have several advantages over LibreWolf, particularly in popularity, growth and licensing. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Helium significantly outpaces LibreWolf in community adoption with 22,283 stars compared to 1,359 stars on GitHub. This 16.4x difference suggests Helium has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Helium has 680 forks, indicating moderate developer engagement.
Helium is growing faster, adding 1,109 stars in the last 30 days (+5.2%) against adding 24 stars for LibreWolf (+1.8%). Helium is both larger and pulling further ahead.
Both projects show recent activity, with Helium last updated 18 hours ago and LibreWolf 1 day ago.
LibreWolf has been in development longer, starting 3 years ago, compared to Helium which began 2 years ago. This 1.5-year head start suggests LibreWolf may have more mature features and established processes.
Helium is licensed under GPL-3.0, while LibreWolf's license terms are not publicly specified.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Web Browsers.
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs