Learn how Brave and Midori Browser differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these web browsers is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
12 hours agoRepository age
9 yearsVersion
v1.98.63License
MPL-2.0Repository
brave/brave-browser
Last 30 days
Last commit
1 day agoRepository age
3 yearsVersion
v11.9.1License
MPL-2.0Repository
midori-desktop
Both Brave and Midori Browser have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Brave significantly outpaces Midori Browser in community adoption with 24,079 stars compared to 412 stars on GitHub. This 58.4x difference suggests Brave has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Brave has 3,263 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Midori Browser is growing faster, adding 7 stars in the last 30 days (+1.7%) against adding 289 stars for Brave (+1.2%). Midori Browser is the smaller project of the two, so it is closing the gap rather than extending a lead.
Both projects show recent activity, with Brave last updated 12 hours ago and Midori Browser 1 day ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Python. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Midori Browser leverages Bash, Typescript, JSX, Next.js, Golang, SCSS, Rust, C, Objective-C, PHP, Vue, Java, Swift, C++, Ruby, Kotlin, MATLAB, C#, Perl, Nuxt.js, Elixir, GLSL, CoffeeScript.
Brave has been in development longer, starting 9 years ago, compared to Midori Browser which began 3 years ago. This 6.0-year head start suggests Brave may have more mature features and established processes.
Both projects use the MPL-2.0 license, providing identical terms for usage and distribution.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Web Browsers.