Learn how Brave and Waterfox differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these tools is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Repository

Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
Repository

Both Brave and Waterfox have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Brave significantly outpaces Waterfox in community adoption with 23,435 stars compared to 6,189 stars on GitHub. This 3.8x difference suggests Brave has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Brave has 3,203 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Waterfox is growing faster, adding 128 stars in the last 30 days (+2.1%) against adding 252 stars for Brave (+1.1%). Waterfox is the smaller project of the two, so it is closing the gap rather than extending a lead.
Both projects show recent activity, with Brave last updated 7 hours ago and Waterfox 5 days ago.
Waterfox has been in development longer, starting 12 years ago, compared to Brave which began 9 years ago. This 3.1-year head start suggests Waterfox may have more mature features and established processes.
Brave is licensed under MPL-2.0, while Waterfox's license terms are not publicly specified.
Brave also focuses on Web Browsers.