Learn how Medusa and Saleor differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these headless commerce tools is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Repository

Medusa appears to have several advantages over Saleor, particularly in popularity, growth and features. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Medusa leads in popularity with 36,189 stars vs 23,307 stars for Saleor. The 55% higher star count indicates stronger community adoption. In terms of developer contributions, Saleor has 6,120 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Medusa is growing faster, adding 503 stars in the last 30 days (+1.4%) against adding 107 stars for Saleor (+0.5%). Medusa is both larger and pulling further ahead.
Both projects show recent activity, with Medusa last updated 12 hours ago and Saleor 15 hours ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with Bash. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Medusa uses JavaScript, CSS, Typescript, JSX, Next.js while Saleor leverages Python.
Saleor has been in development longer, starting 14 years ago, compared to Medusa which began 7 years ago. This 7.0-year head start suggests Saleor may have more mature features and established processes.
The projects use different licenses: Medusa is licensed under MIT while Saleor uses BSD-3-Clause. Consider the licensing requirements when choosing for your project.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Headless Commerce.
Medusa provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while Saleor may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.