Learn how Medusa and Saleor differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these headless commerce tools is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
1 day agoRepository age
7 yearsVersion
v2.22.4License
MITSelf-hosted
YesRepository
medusajs/medusa
Last 30 days
Last commit
2 days agoRepository age
14 yearsVersion
3.23.47License
BSD-3-ClauseRepository
saleor/saleor
Medusa appears to have several advantages over Saleor, particularly in popularity, growth and features. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Medusa leads in popularity with 37,126 stars vs 23,514 stars for Saleor. The 58% higher star count indicates stronger community adoption. In terms of developer contributions, Saleor has 6,183 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Medusa is growing faster, adding 459 stars in the last 30 days (+1.3%) against adding 87 stars for Saleor (+0.4%). Medusa is both larger and pulling further ahead.
Both projects show recent activity, with Medusa last updated 1 day ago and Saleor 2 days ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with Bash. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Medusa uses JavaScript, CSS, Typescript, JSX, Next.js while Saleor leverages Python.
Saleor has been in development longer, starting 14 years ago, compared to Medusa which began 7 years ago. This 7.0-year head start suggests Saleor may have more mature features and established processes.
The projects use different licenses: Medusa is licensed under MIT while Saleor uses BSD-3-Clause. Consider the licensing requirements when choosing for your project.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Headless Commerce.
Medusa provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while Saleor may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.