Learn how Medusa and Saleor differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these headless commerce tools is best for you.
Activity score

Stars
Forks
Last commit
Repository age
License
Activity score

Both Medusa and Saleor have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Both tools have similar popularity levels, with Medusa having 34,425 stars and Saleor having 23,000 stars on GitHub. In terms of developer contributions, Saleor has 6,055 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Both projects show recent activity, with Medusa last updated 5 hours ago and Saleor 9 hours ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with Bash. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Medusa uses JavaScript, CSS, Typescript, JSX, Next.js while Saleor leverages Python.
Saleor has been in development longer, starting 13 years ago, compared to Medusa which began 6 years ago. This 7.0-year head start suggests Saleor may have more mature features and established processes.
The projects use different licenses: Medusa is licensed under MIT while Saleor uses BSD-3-Clause. Consider the licensing requirements when choosing for your project.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Headless Commerce.
Medusa provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while Saleor may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.