Learn how **Bagisto ** and Saleor differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these headless commerce tools is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
12 hours agoRepository age
8 yearsVersion
v2.5.0License
MITSelf-hosted
YesRepository
bagisto/bagisto
Last 30 days
Last commit
23 hours agoRepository age
14 yearsVersion
3.23.47License
BSD-3-ClauseRepository
saleor/saleor
Both **Bagisto ** and Saleor have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Both tools have similar popularity levels, with **Bagisto ** having 28,332 stars and Saleor having 23,508 stars on GitHub. In terms of developer contributions, Saleor has 6,174 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
**Bagisto ** and Saleor are moving at much the same rate, adding 120 stars and adding 90 stars respectively over the last 30 days (+0.4% vs +0.4%). Neither is pulling away from the other on momentum alone.
Both projects show recent activity, with **Bagisto ** last updated 12 hours ago and Saleor 23 hours ago.
**Bagisto ** uses JavaScript, CSS, PHP, Laravel while Saleor leverages Bash, Python.
Saleor has been in development longer, starting 14 years ago, compared to **Bagisto ** which began 8 years ago. This 5.7-year head start suggests Saleor may have more mature features and established processes.
The projects use different licenses: **Bagisto ** is licensed under MIT while Saleor uses BSD-3-Clause. Consider the licensing requirements when choosing for your project.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Headless Commerce. However, they also have distinct specializations: **Bagisto ** also focuses on Full-Stack E-commerce.
**Bagisto ** provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while Saleor may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.