Learn how **Bagisto ** and Solidus differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these full-stack e-commerce tools is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Repository

**Bagisto ** appears to have several advantages over Solidus, particularly in popularity, growth and features. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
**Bagisto ** significantly outpaces Solidus in community adoption with 28,091 stars compared to 5,324 stars on GitHub. This 5.3x difference suggests Bagisto has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, **Bagisto ** has 3,274 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Bagisto ** is growing faster, adding 144 stars in the last 30 days (+0.5%) against adding 7 stars for Solidus (+0.1%**). Bagisto is both larger and pulling further ahead.
Both projects show recent activity, with **Bagisto ** last updated 3 days ago and Solidus 1 day ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: **Bagisto ** uses PHP, Laravel while Solidus leverages Bash, SCSS, Ruby.
Solidus has been in development longer, starting 12 years ago, compared to **Bagisto ** which began 8 years ago. This 3.6-year head start suggests Solidus may have more mature features and established processes.
The projects use different licenses: **Bagisto ** is licensed under MIT while Solidus uses BSD-3-Clause. Consider the licensing requirements when choosing for your project.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Full-Stack E-commerce. However, they also have distinct specializations: **Bagisto ** also focuses on Headless Commerce.
**Bagisto ** provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while Solidus may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.