Learn how Alokai and **Bagisto ** differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these headless commerce tools is best for you.


**Bagisto ** appears to have several advantages over Alokai, particularly in popularity, growth and activity. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
**Bagisto ** leads in popularity with 27,976 stars vs 10,942 stars for Alokai. The 156% higher star count indicates stronger community adoption. In terms of developer contributions, **Bagisto ** has 3,238 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Bagisto ** is growing faster, adding 231 stars in the last 30 days (+0.8%) against adding 8 stars for Alokai (+0.1%**). Bagisto is both larger and pulling further ahead.
**Bagisto ** shows more recent development activity with its last commit 3 days ago, while Alokai was last updated 2 months ago. This suggests Bagisto is being more actively maintained.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Alokai uses Typescript while **Bagisto ** leverages CSS, PHP, Laravel.
Alokai has been in development longer, starting 9 years ago, compared to **Bagisto ** which began 8 years ago. This 1.1-year head start suggests Alokai may have more mature features and established processes.
Both projects use the MIT license, providing identical terms for usage and distribution.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Headless Commerce. However, they also have distinct specializations: Alokai also focuses on Frontend Development, Frontend E-commerce Solutions while **Bagisto ** extends into Full-Stack E-commerce.
vs
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Repository
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Repository