Learn how **Bagisto ** and Medusa differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these headless commerce tools is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
2 days agoRepository age
8 yearsVersion
v2.5.1License
MITSelf-hosted
YesRepository
bagisto/bagisto
Last 30 days
Last commit
1 day agoRepository age
7 yearsVersion
v2.22.4License
MITSelf-hosted
YesRepository
medusajs/medusa
Both **Bagisto ** and Medusa have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Both tools have similar popularity levels, with **Bagisto ** having 28,344 stars and Medusa having 37,126 stars on GitHub. In terms of developer contributions, Medusa has 5,494 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Medusa is growing faster, adding 459 stars in the last 30 days (+1.3%) against adding 121 stars for Bagisto ** (+0.4%**). Medusa is both larger and pulling further ahead.
Both projects show recent activity, with **Bagisto ** last updated 2 days ago and Medusa 1 day ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: **Bagisto ** uses PHP, Laravel while Medusa leverages Bash, Typescript, JSX, Next.js.
**Bagisto ** has been in development longer, starting 8 years ago, compared to Medusa which began 7 years ago. This 1.4-year head start suggests Bagisto may have more mature features and established processes.
Both projects use the MIT license, providing identical terms for usage and distribution.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Headless Commerce. However, they also have distinct specializations: **Bagisto ** also focuses on Full-Stack E-commerce.
Both **Bagisto ** and Medusa offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.