Learn how Medusa and Shopware differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these headless commerce tools is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Both Medusa and Shopware have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Medusa significantly outpaces Shopware in community adoption with 36,146 stars compared to 3,420 stars on GitHub. This 10.6x difference suggests Medusa has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Medusa has 5,188 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Medusa is growing faster, adding 530 stars in the last 30 days (+1.5%) against adding 21 stars for Shopware (+0.6%). Medusa is both larger and pulling further ahead.
Both projects show recent activity, with Medusa last updated 1 day ago and Shopware 1 day ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Typescript. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Medusa uses Bash, JSX, Next.js while Shopware leverages SCSS, Vue, PHP.
Shopware has been in development longer, starting 8 years ago, compared to Medusa which began 7 years ago. This 1.7-year head start suggests Shopware may have more mature features and established processes.
Both projects use the MIT license, providing identical terms for usage and distribution.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Headless Commerce. However, they also have distinct specializations: Shopware extends into Full-Stack E-commerce.
Both Medusa and Shopware offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.