Learn how Saleor and Shopware differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these headless commerce tools is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
23 hours agoRepository age
14 yearsVersion
3.23.47License
BSD-3-ClauseRepository
saleor/saleor
Last 30 days
Last commit
8 hours agoRepository age
9 yearsVersion
v6.7.16.0License
MITSelf-hosted
YesRepository
shopware/shopware
Both Saleor and Shopware have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Saleor significantly outpaces Shopware in community adoption with 23,508 stars compared to 3,468 stars on GitHub. This 6.8x difference suggests Saleor has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Saleor has 6,174 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Shopware is growing faster, adding 27 stars in the last 30 days (+0.8%) against adding 90 stars for Saleor (+0.4%). Shopware is the smaller project of the two, so it is closing the gap rather than extending a lead.
Both projects show recent activity, with Saleor last updated 23 hours ago and Shopware 8 hours ago.
Saleor uses Bash, Python while Shopware leverages JavaScript, CSS, Typescript, SCSS, PHP, Vue.
Saleor has been in development longer, starting 14 years ago, compared to Shopware which began 9 years ago. This 5.3-year head start suggests Saleor may have more mature features and established processes.
The projects use different licenses: Saleor is licensed under BSD-3-Clause while Shopware uses MIT. Consider the licensing requirements when choosing for your project.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Headless Commerce. However, they also have distinct specializations: Shopware extends into Full-Stack E-commerce.
Shopware provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while Saleor may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.