Ad
 
Learn more

Inngest vs Windmill

Learn how Inngest and Windmill differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these workflow orchestration tools is best for you.

vs
Favicon of Inngest

Inngest

Simplify backend processes with event-driven functions, seamless integrations, and powerful debugging tools for developers.
  • Stars


    5,413
  • Forks


    309
  • Last commit


    21 hours ago
  • Repository age


    5 years
View Repository

Auto-fetched .

Screenshot of Inngest
Favicon of Windmill

Windmill

Powerful, self-hosted platform for building and running workflows, scripts, and apps with code-first approach and collaborative features.
  • Stars


    16,589
  • Forks


    969
  • Last commit


    15 hours ago
  • Repository age


    4 years
  • Self-hosted


    Yes
View Repository

Auto-fetched .

Screenshot of Windmill

Detailed Comparison

Windmill appears to have several advantages over Inngest, particularly in popularity and features. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, technology, maturity and features when making your decision.

Windmill wins
Community & Popularity

Windmill significantly outpaces Inngest in community adoption with 16,589 stars compared to 5,413 stars on GitHub. This 3.1x difference suggests Windmill has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Windmill has 969 forks, indicating moderate developer engagement.

Comparable
Development Activity

Both projects show recent activity, with Inngest last updated 21 hours ago and Windmill 15 hours ago.

Comparable
Technology Stack

Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Bash, Typescript, Golang. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Inngest uses JSX, Next.js, Lua while Windmill leverages Python, Rust, C, Objective-C, SvelteKit.

Comparable
Project Maturity

Both projects started around the same time, with Inngest beginning 5 years ago and Windmill 4 years ago.

Comparable
Use Cases & Features

Both tools serve similar use cases in Workflow Orchestration. However, they also have distinct specializations: Inngest also focuses on Backend-as-a-Service (BaaS) while Windmill extends into PaaS & Deployment Tools, Workflow Automation.

Windmill wins
Hosting & Deployment

Windmill provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while Inngest may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.