Inngest vs Temporal
Learn how Inngest and Temporal differ in their key features, development activity, technology
stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these durable execution tools is best for you.
Learn how Inngest and Temporal differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these durable execution tools is best for you.
Inngest
Last 30 days
Last commit
1 day agoRepository age
5 yearsVersion
v1.44.0License
SSPL-1.0Self-hosted
YesRepository
inngest/inngest
Temporal
Last 30 days
Last commit
24 hours agoRepository age
7 yearsVersion
v1.31.2License
MITSelf-hosted
YesRepository
temporalio/temporal
Detailed Comparison
Temporal appears to have several advantages over Inngest, particularly in popularity, growth, maturity and licensing. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Temporal appears to have several advantages over Inngest, particularly in popularity, growth, maturity and licensing. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Community & Popularity
Temporal significantly outpaces Inngest in community adoption with 22,837 stars compared to 5,808 stars on GitHub. This 3.9x difference suggests Temporal has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Temporal has 1,870 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Growth Momentum
Temporal is growing faster, adding 692 stars in the last 30 days (+3.1%) against adding 114 stars for Inngest (+2%). Temporal is both larger and pulling further ahead.
Development Activity
Both projects show recent activity, with Inngest last updated 1 day ago and Temporal 24 hours ago.
Technology Stack
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with Bash, Golang. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Inngest uses JavaScript, CSS, Typescript, JSX, Next.js, Lua.
Project Maturity
Temporal has been in development longer, starting 7 years ago, compared to Inngest which began 5 years ago. This 1.7-year head start suggests Temporal may have more mature features and established processes.
Licensing
Temporal uses the MIT license, which is more permissive than Inngest's SSPL-1.0 license, potentially offering greater flexibility for commercial use and integration.
Use Cases & Features
Both tools serve similar use cases in Durable Execution.
Hosting & Deployment
Both Inngest and Temporal offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.
ScreenshotOne – The screenshot API for developers. Render screenshots in one simple API call