Hatchet vs Inngest
Learn how Hatchet and Inngest differ in their key features, development activity, technology
stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these durable execution tools is best for you.
Learn how Hatchet and Inngest differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these durable execution tools is best for you.
Hatchet
Last 30 days
Last commit
14 hours agoRepository age
3 yearsVersion
v0.114.2License
MITSelf-hosted
YesRepository
hatchet-dev/hatchet
Inngest
Last 30 days
Last commit
9 hours agoRepository age
5 yearsVersion
v1.49.0License
SSPL-1.0Self-hosted
YesRepository
inngest/inngest
Detailed Comparison
Both Hatchet and Inngest have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Both Hatchet and Inngest have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Community & Popularity
Both tools have similar popularity levels, with Hatchet having 8,225 stars and Inngest having 6,021 stars on GitHub. In terms of developer contributions, Hatchet has 532 forks, indicating moderate developer engagement.
Growth Momentum
Hatchet and Inngest are moving at much the same rate, adding 153 stars and adding 102 stars respectively over the last 30 days (+1.9% vs +1.7%). Neither is pulling away from the other on momentum alone.
Development Activity
Both projects show recent activity, with Hatchet last updated 14 hours ago and Inngest 9 hours ago.
Technology Stack
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Bash, Typescript, JSX, Next.js, Golang. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Hatchet uses Python while Inngest leverages Lua.
Project Maturity
Inngest has been in development longer, starting 5 years ago, compared to Hatchet which began 3 years ago. This 2.6-year head start suggests Inngest may have more mature features and established processes.
Licensing
Hatchet uses the MIT license, which is more permissive than Inngest's SSPL-1.0 license, potentially offering greater flexibility for commercial use and integration.
Use Cases & Features
Both tools serve similar use cases in Durable Execution.
Hosting & Deployment
Both Hatchet and Inngest offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.
Postiz – The All-in-One agentic social media scheduling tool