Hatchet vs Inngest
Learn how Hatchet and Inngest differ in their key features, development activity, technology
stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these durable execution tools is best for you.
Learn how Hatchet and Inngest differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these durable execution tools is best for you.
Hatchet
Last 30 days
Last commit
1 day agoRepository age
3 yearsVersion
v0.105.16License
MITSelf-hosted
YesRepository
hatchet-dev/hatchet
Inngest
Last 30 days
Last commit
1 day agoRepository age
5 yearsVersion
v1.44.0License
SSPL-1.0Self-hosted
YesRepository
inngest/inngest
Detailed Comparison
Both Hatchet and Inngest have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Both Hatchet and Inngest have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Community & Popularity
Both tools have similar popularity levels, with Hatchet having 7,874 stars and Inngest having 5,808 stars on GitHub. In terms of developer contributions, Hatchet has 487 forks, indicating moderate developer engagement.
Growth Momentum
Hatchet is growing faster, adding 198 stars in the last 30 days (+2.6%) against adding 114 stars for Inngest (+2%). Hatchet is both larger and pulling further ahead.
Development Activity
Both projects show recent activity, with Hatchet last updated 1 day ago and Inngest 1 day ago.
Technology Stack
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Bash, Typescript, JSX, Next.js, Golang. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Hatchet uses Python while Inngest leverages Lua.
Project Maturity
Inngest has been in development longer, starting 5 years ago, compared to Hatchet which began 3 years ago. This 2.6-year head start suggests Inngest may have more mature features and established processes.
Licensing
Hatchet uses the MIT license, which is more permissive than Inngest's SSPL-1.0 license, potentially offering greater flexibility for commercial use and integration.
Use Cases & Features
Both tools serve similar use cases in Durable Execution.
Hosting & Deployment
Both Hatchet and Inngest offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.
Sent – Messaging Infrastructure for Developers. One API for SMS, WhatsApp, and RCS across 190+ countries.