Learn how Ceph and MinIO differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these distributed storage tools is best for you.

Stars
Forks
Last commit
Repository age
License
Warning: This repository was archived by the owner. It might not be actively maintained anymore.
Auto-fetched .

Both Ceph and MinIO have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
MinIO significantly outpaces Ceph in community adoption with 60,872 stars compared to 16,552 stars on GitHub. This 3.7x difference suggests MinIO has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, MinIO has 7,474 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Both projects show recent activity, with Ceph last updated 9 hours ago and MinIO 13 days ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, Bash, Python, Golang. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Ceph uses CSS, Typescript, SCSS, C, Objective-C, Java, C++, Perl, Lua.
Ceph has been in development longer, starting 15 years ago, compared to MinIO which began 11 years ago. This 3.4-year head start suggests Ceph may have more mature features and established processes.
MinIO is licensed under AGPL-3.0, while Ceph's license terms are not publicly specified.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Distributed Storage, Storage. However, they also have distinct specializations: MinIO extends into Cloud Storage.