What is the main difference between Ceph and MinIO?

Ceph and MinIO are both distributed storage tools but differ in their approach, features, and target audience. Compare their GitHub stats, technology stack, and community adoption to make the best choice.

Which is better: Ceph or MinIO?

The choice between Ceph and MinIO depends on your specific needs, technical requirements, and team preferences. Both are quality open source solutions with active communities.

Can I migrate from Ceph to MinIO?

Migration between Ceph and MinIO is possible but requires careful planning. Consider data export/import capabilities, feature parity, and potential workflow changes.

Databuddy – AI-Native Web & Product Analytics you can trust, turn manual dashboards into automated insights.

Start Tracking Free

Learn more

Ceph vs MinIO

Learn how Ceph and MinIO differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these distributed storage tools is best for you.

Ceph

Ceph provides unified object, block, and file storage from a single cluster built on commodity hardware.

Visit Ceph Read more

Stars
16,714
Forks
6,421
Last commit
7 hours ago
Repository age
15 years

Activity score

95/100

View Repository

MinIO

Open source S3-compatible object storage optimized for cloud-native and AI applications, delivering unmatched performance and scalability

Visit MinIO Read more

Stars
61,191
Forks
7,592
Last commit
2 months ago
Repository age
11 years
License
AGPL-3.0

Activity score

0/100

This repository was archived by the owner and is no longer maintained.

View Repository

Detailed Comparison

Both Ceph and MinIO have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.

MinIO wins

Community & Popularity

MinIO significantly outpaces Ceph in community adoption with 61,191 stars compared to 16,714 stars on GitHub. This 3.7x difference suggests MinIO has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, MinIO has 7,592 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.

Ceph wins

Development Activity

Ceph shows more recent development activity with its last commit 7 hours ago, while MinIO was last updated 2 months ago. This suggests Ceph is being more actively maintained.

Comparable

Technology Stack

Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, Bash, Python, Golang. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Ceph uses CSS, Typescript, SCSS, C, Objective-C, Java, C++, Perl, Lua.

Ceph wins

Project Maturity

Ceph has been in development longer, starting 15 years ago, compared to MinIO which began 11 years ago. This 3.4-year head start suggests Ceph may have more mature features and established processes.

MinIO wins

Licensing

MinIO is licensed under AGPL-3.0, while Ceph's license terms are not publicly specified.

Comparable

Use Cases & Features

Both tools serve similar use cases in Distributed Storage, Storage. However, they also have distinct specializations: MinIO extends into Cloud Storage.

Other tool comparisons to consider