Learn how Ceph and MinIO differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these distributed storage tools is best for you.

Both Ceph and MinIO have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
MinIO significantly outpaces Ceph in community adoption with 61,399 stars compared to 16,862 stars on GitHub. This 3.6x difference suggests MinIO has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, MinIO has 7,702 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Ceph shows more recent development activity with its last commit 10 hours ago, while MinIO was last updated 3 months ago. This suggests Ceph is being more actively maintained.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, Bash, Python, Golang. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Ceph uses CSS, Typescript, SCSS, C, Objective-C, Java, C++, Perl, Lua.
Ceph has been in development longer, starting 15 years ago, compared to MinIO which began 12 years ago. This 3.4-year head start suggests Ceph may have more mature features and established processes.
MinIO is licensed under AGPL-3.0, while Ceph's license terms are not publicly specified.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Distributed Storage, Storage. However, they also have distinct specializations: MinIO extends into Cloud Storage.

vs
Activity score
Stars
Forks
Last commit
Repository age
Repository
Activity score
Stars
Forks
Last commit
Repository age
License
Repository
This repository was archived by the owner and is no longer maintained.