What is the main difference between Ceph and MinIO?

Ceph and MinIO are both object storage servers but differ in their approach, features, and target audience. Compare their GitHub stats, technology stack, and community adoption to make the best choice.

Which is better: Ceph or MinIO?

The choice between Ceph and MinIO depends on your specific needs, technical requirements, and team preferences. Both are quality open source solutions with active communities.

Can I migrate from Ceph to MinIO?

Migration between Ceph and MinIO is possible but requires careful planning. Consider data export/import capabilities, feature parity, and potential workflow changes.

Highseat – Cookieless analytics with revenue by source.

Learn more

Ceph vs MinIO

Learn how Ceph and MinIO differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these object storage servers is best for you.

Ceph

Ceph provides unified object, block, and file storage from a single cluster built on commodity hardware.

Visit Ceph Read more

17,209stars+103(+0.6%)

Last 30 days

Last commit
7 hours ago
Repository age
15 years
Repository
ceph/ceph

MinIO

Open source S3-compatible object storage optimized for cloud-native and AI applications, delivering unmatched performance and scalability

Visit MinIO Read more

61,264stars-66(-0.1%)

Last 30 days

This repository was archived by the owner and is no longer maintained.

Last commit
7 months ago
Repository age
12 years
License
AGPL-3.0
Repository
minio/minio

Detailed Comparison

Both Ceph and MinIO have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.

MinIO wins

Community & Popularity

MinIO significantly outpaces Ceph in community adoption with 61,264 stars compared to 17,209 stars on GitHub. This 3.6x difference suggests MinIO has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, MinIO has 8,307 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.

Ceph wins

Growth Momentum

Ceph is growing faster, adding 103 stars in the last 30 days (+0.6%) against losing 66 stars for MinIO (-0.1%). Ceph is the smaller project of the two, so it is closing the gap rather than extending a lead.

Ceph wins

Development Activity

Ceph shows more recent development activity with its last commit 7 hours ago, while MinIO was last updated 7 months ago. This suggests Ceph is being more actively maintained.

Comparable

Technology Stack

Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, Bash, Python, Golang. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Ceph uses CSS, Typescript, SCSS, C, Objective-C, Java, C++, Perl, Lua.

Ceph wins

Project Maturity

Ceph has been in development longer, starting 15 years ago, compared to MinIO which began 12 years ago. This 3.4-year head start suggests Ceph may have more mature features and established processes.

MinIO wins