Learn how Ceph and Garage differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these object storage servers is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Repository

Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Both Ceph and Garage have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Ceph significantly outpaces Garage in community adoption with 17,080 stars compared to 4,600 stars on GitHub. This 3.7x difference suggests Ceph has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Ceph has 6,513 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Garage is growing faster, adding 168 stars in the last 30 days (+3.8%) against adding 103 stars for Ceph (+0.6%). Garage is the smaller project of the two, so it is closing the gap rather than extending a lead.
Both projects show recent activity, with Ceph last updated 23 hours ago and Garage 1 day ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Bash, Python. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Ceph uses Typescript, Golang, SCSS, C, Objective-C, Java, C++, Perl, Lua while Garage leverages Rust, Clojure.
Ceph has been in development longer, starting 15 years ago, compared to Garage which began 5 years ago. This 10.4-year head start suggests Ceph may have more mature features and established processes.
Garage is licensed under AGPL-3.0, while Ceph's license terms are not publicly specified.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Object Storage.
Garage provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while Ceph may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.