Learn how Garage and MinIO differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these cloud storage tools is best for you.
Auto-fetched .

Stars
Forks
Last commit
Repository age
License
Warning: This repository was archived by the owner. It might not be actively maintained anymore.
Auto-fetched .

Both Garage and MinIO have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
MinIO significantly outpaces Garage in community adoption with 60,872 stars compared to 3,708 stars on GitHub. This 16.4x difference suggests MinIO has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, MinIO has 7,474 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Both projects show recent activity, with Garage last updated 19 hours ago and MinIO 13 days ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, Bash, Python. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Garage uses CSS, Rust, Clojure while MinIO leverages Golang.
MinIO has been in development longer, starting 11 years ago, compared to Garage which began 4 years ago. This 6.9-year head start suggests MinIO may have more mature features and established processes.
Both projects use the AGPL-3.0 license, providing identical terms for usage and distribution.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Cloud Storage, Distributed Storage. However, they also have distinct specializations: MinIO extends into Storage.
Garage provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while MinIO may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.