Learn how Garage and Storj differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these object storage servers is best for you.
Last 30 days

Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Repository

Both Garage and Storj have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Both tools have similar popularity levels, with Garage having 4,736 stars and Storj having 3,282 stars on GitHub. In terms of developer contributions, Storj has 427 forks, indicating moderate developer engagement.
Garage is growing faster, adding 182 stars in the last 30 days (+4%) against adding 0 stars for Storj (0%). Garage is both larger and pulling further ahead.
Both projects show recent activity, with Garage last updated 4 days ago and Storj 11 hours ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, Bash, Python. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Garage uses CSS, Rust, Clojure while Storj leverages Typescript, Golang, SCSS, Vue, C#, SvelteKit.
Storj has been in development longer, starting 9 years ago, compared to Garage which began 5 years ago. This 3.7-year head start suggests Storj may have more mature features and established processes.
Both projects use the AGPL-3.0 license, providing identical terms for usage and distribution.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Object Storage.
Garage provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while Storj may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.