Learn how MinIO and Storj differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these object storage servers is best for you.
Last 30 days
This repository was archived by the owner and is no longer maintained.
Last commit
7 months agoRepository age
12 yearsLicense
AGPL-3.0Repository
minio/minio
Last 30 days
Last commit
1 day agoRepository age
9 yearsVersion
v1.166.2License
AGPL-3.0Repository
storj/storj
Both MinIO and Storj have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
MinIO significantly outpaces Storj in community adoption with 61,264 stars compared to 3,284 stars on GitHub. This 18.7x difference suggests MinIO has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, MinIO has 8,307 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
MinIO and Storj are moving at much the same rate, losing 66 stars and adding 2 stars respectively over the last 30 days (-0.1% vs +0.1%). Neither is pulling away from the other on momentum alone.
Storj shows more recent development activity with its last commit 1 day ago, while MinIO was last updated 7 months ago. This suggests Storj is being more actively maintained.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, Bash, Python, Golang. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Storj leverages Typescript, SCSS, Vue, C#, SvelteKit.
MinIO has been in development longer, starting 12 years ago, compared to Storj which began 9 years ago. This 3.3-year head start suggests MinIO may have more mature features and established processes.
Both projects use the AGPL-3.0 license, providing identical terms for usage and distribution.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Object Storage.