Learn how MinIO and Storj differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these cloud storage tools is best for you.
Stars
Forks
Last commit
Repository age
License
Warning: This repository was archived by the owner. It might not be actively maintained anymore.
Auto-fetched .

Stars
Forks
Last commit
Repository age
License
Auto-fetched .

Both MinIO and Storj have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
MinIO significantly outpaces Storj in community adoption with 60,718 stars compared to 3,245 stars on GitHub. This 18.7x difference suggests MinIO has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, MinIO has 7,392 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Storj shows more recent development activity with its last commit 6 hours ago, while MinIO was last updated 2 months ago. This suggests Storj is being more actively maintained.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, Bash, Python, Golang. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Storj leverages Typescript, SCSS, Vue, C#, SvelteKit.
MinIO has been in development longer, starting 11 years ago, compared to Storj which began 8 years ago. This 3.3-year head start suggests MinIO may have more mature features and established processes.
Both projects use the AGPL-3.0 license, providing identical terms for usage and distribution.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Cloud Storage, Distributed Storage. However, they also have distinct specializations: MinIO also focuses on Storage.