Learn how MinIO and Storj differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these object storage servers is best for you.
Last 30 days
This repository was archived by the owner and is no longer maintained.
Last commit
Repository age
License
Repository

Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Repository

Both MinIO and Storj have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
MinIO significantly outpaces Storj in community adoption with 61,346 stars compared to 3,282 stars on GitHub. This 18.7x difference suggests MinIO has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, MinIO has 8,046 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Storj is growing faster, adding 7 stars in the last 30 days (+0.2%) against losing 30 stars for MinIO (0%). Storj is the smaller project of the two, so it is closing the gap rather than extending a lead.
Storj shows more recent development activity with its last commit 2 days ago, while MinIO was last updated 5 months ago. This suggests Storj is being more actively maintained.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, Bash, Python, Golang. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Storj leverages Typescript, SCSS, Vue, C#, SvelteKit.
MinIO has been in development longer, starting 12 years ago, compared to Storj which began 8 years ago. This 3.3-year head start suggests MinIO may have more mature features and established processes.
Both projects use the AGPL-3.0 license, providing identical terms for usage and distribution.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Object Storage.