Learn how Alarik and Garage differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these object storage servers is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
2 months agoRepository age
11 monthsLicense
Apache-2.0Self-hosted
YesRepository
alarik
Last 30 days

Garage appears to have several advantages over Alarik, particularly in popularity, growth, activity and maturity. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Garage significantly outpaces Alarik in community adoption with 4,842 stars compared to 580 stars on GitHub. This 8.3x difference suggests Garage has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Garage has 187 forks, indicating moderate developer engagement.
Garage is growing faster, adding 178 stars in the last 30 days (+3.8%) against adding 18 stars for Alarik (+3.2%). Garage is both larger and pulling further ahead.
Garage shows more recent development activity with its last commit 1 day ago, while Alarik was last updated 2 months ago. This suggests Garage is being more actively maintained.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Bash. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Alarik uses Typescript, C, Objective-C, Vue, Swift, Nuxt.js while Garage leverages Python, Rust, Clojure.
Garage has been in development longer, starting 5 years ago, compared to Alarik which began 11 months ago. This 4.1-year head start suggests Garage may have more mature features and established processes.
The projects use different licenses: Alarik is licensed under Apache-2.0 while Garage uses AGPL-3.0. Consider the licensing requirements when choosing for your project.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Object Storage.
Both Alarik and Garage offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.