Alarik vs Ceph
Learn how Alarik and Ceph differ in their key features, development activity, technology
stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these object storage servers is best for you.
Learn how Alarik and Ceph differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these object storage servers is best for you.
Alarik
Last 30 days
Last commit
9 days agoRepository age
10 monthsLicense
Apache-2.0Self-hosted
YesRepository
achtungsoftware/alarik
Ceph
Last 30 days
Last commit
8 hours agoRepository age
15 yearsRepository
ceph/ceph
Detailed Comparison
Both Alarik and Ceph have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Both Alarik and Ceph have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Community & Popularity
Ceph significantly outpaces Alarik in community adoption with 17,079 stars compared to 551 stars on GitHub. This 31.0x difference suggests Ceph has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Ceph has 6,512 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Growth Momentum
Alarik is growing faster, adding 31 stars in the last 30 days (+6%) against adding 102 stars for Ceph (+0.6%). Alarik is the smaller project of the two, so it is closing the gap rather than extending a lead.
Development Activity
Both projects show recent activity, with Alarik last updated 9 days ago and Ceph 8 hours ago.
Technology Stack
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Bash, Typescript, C, Objective-C. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Alarik uses Vue, Swift, Nuxt.js while Ceph leverages Python, Golang, SCSS, Java, C++, Perl, Lua.
Project Maturity
Ceph has been in development longer, starting 15 years ago, compared to Alarik which began 10 months ago. This 14.5-year head start suggests Ceph may have more mature features and established processes.
Licensing
Alarik is licensed under Apache-2.0, while Ceph's license terms are not publicly specified.
Use Cases & Features
Both tools serve similar use cases in Object Storage.
Hosting & Deployment
Alarik provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while Ceph may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.
InfluxDB – The purpose-built time series platform for high-velocity ingestion and real-time queries at scale.