Learn how Ceph and SlateDB differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these tools is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Repository

Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Repository

Both Ceph and SlateDB have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Ceph significantly outpaces SlateDB in community adoption with 17,102 stars compared to 3,470 stars on GitHub. This 4.9x difference suggests Ceph has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Ceph has 6,529 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
SlateDB is growing faster, adding 77 stars in the last 30 days (+2.3%) against adding 87 stars for Ceph (+0.5%). SlateDB is the smaller project of the two, so it is closing the gap rather than extending a lead.
Both projects show recent activity, with Ceph last updated 4 hours ago and SlateDB 17 hours ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with Bash, Python. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Ceph uses JavaScript, CSS, Typescript, Golang, SCSS, C, Objective-C, Java, C++, Perl, Lua while SlateDB leverages Rust.
Ceph has been in development longer, starting 15 years ago, compared to SlateDB which began 3 years ago. This 12.7-year head start suggests Ceph may have more mature features and established processes.
SlateDB is licensed under Apache-2.0, while Ceph's license terms are not publicly specified.
Ceph also focuses on Object Storage while SlateDB extends into NoSQL & Document Databases.