Ceph vs SlateDB
Learn how Ceph and SlateDB differ in their key features, development activity, technology
stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these distributed storage tools is best for you.
Learn how Ceph and SlateDB differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these distributed storage tools is best for you.
Ceph
Last 30 days
Last commit
8 hours agoRepository age
15 yearsRepository
ceph/ceph
SlateDB
Last 30 days
Last commit
7 hours agoRepository age
2 yearsVersion
v0.15.0License
Apache-2.0Repository
slatedb/slatedb
Detailed Comparison
Both Ceph and SlateDB have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Both Ceph and SlateDB have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Community & Popularity
Ceph significantly outpaces SlateDB in community adoption with 16,948 stars compared to 3,319 stars on GitHub. This 5.1x difference suggests Ceph has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Ceph has 6,482 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Growth Momentum
SlateDB is growing faster, adding 106 stars in the last 30 days (+3.3%) against adding 102 stars for Ceph (+0.6%). SlateDB is the smaller project of the two, so it is closing the gap rather than extending a lead.
Development Activity
Both projects show recent activity, with Ceph last updated 8 hours ago and SlateDB 7 hours ago.
Technology Stack
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with Bash, Python. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Ceph uses JavaScript, CSS, Typescript, SCSS, Golang, C, Objective-C, Java, C++, Perl, Lua while SlateDB leverages Rust.
Project Maturity
Ceph has been in development longer, starting 15 years ago, compared to SlateDB which began 2 years ago. This 12.7-year head start suggests Ceph may have more mature features and established processes.
Licensing
SlateDB is licensed under Apache-2.0, while Ceph's license terms are not publicly specified.
Use Cases & Features
Both tools serve similar use cases in Distributed Storage. However, they also have distinct specializations: Ceph also focuses on Storage.
Capture – Capture screenshots, generate PDFs, scrape content, extract metadata, and automate browsers with one API.