Ad
CodeRabbit – The leading AI Code Review platform. Ship better quality code in 50% less time, with 90% fewer bugs.Learn More
CodeRabbit – The leading AI Code Review platform. Ship better quality code in 50% less time, with 90% fewer bugs.CodeRabbit – The leading AI Code Review platform. Ship better quality code in 50% less time, with 90% fewer bugs.Learn how Ceph and SlateDB differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these distributed storage tools is best for you.
Both Ceph and SlateDB have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Ceph significantly outpaces SlateDB in community adoption with 16,862 stars compared to 3,245 stars on GitHub. This 5.2x difference suggests Ceph has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Ceph has 6,456 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Both projects show recent activity, with Ceph last updated 9 hours ago and SlateDB 8 hours ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with Bash, Python. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Ceph uses JavaScript, CSS, Typescript, SCSS, Golang, C, Objective-C, Java, C++, Perl, Lua while SlateDB leverages Rust.
Ceph has been in development longer, starting 15 years ago, compared to SlateDB which began 2 years ago. This 12.7-year head start suggests Ceph may have more mature features and established processes.
SlateDB is licensed under Apache-2.0, while Ceph's license terms are not publicly specified.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Distributed Storage. However, they also have distinct specializations: Ceph also focuses on Storage.
Cephvs
StorjActivity score
Stars
Forks
Last commit
Repository age
Repository
Activity score
Stars
Forks
Last commit
Repository age
License
Repository
