What is the main difference between Temporal and Windmill?

Temporal and Windmill are both workflow orchestration tools but differ in their approach, features, and target audience. Compare their GitHub stats, technology stack, and community adoption to make the best choice.

Which is better: Temporal or Windmill?

The choice between Temporal and Windmill depends on your specific needs, technical requirements, and team preferences. Both are quality open source solutions with active communities.

Can I migrate from Temporal to Windmill?

Migration between Temporal and Windmill is possible but requires careful planning. Consider data export/import capabilities, feature parity, and potential workflow changes.

Sent – A unified API for sending messages across SMS, RCS, and apps like WhatsApp.

Learn More

Learn more

Temporal vs Windmill

Learn how Temporal and Windmill differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these workflow orchestration tools is best for you.

Temporal

Open source platform that eliminates infrastructure complexity by handling failures, network issues, and long-running processes to ensure reliable workflow execution

Visit Temporal Read more

Stars
20,177
Forks
1,574
Last commit
12 hours ago
Repository age
7 years
License
MIT
Self-hosted
Yes

View Repository

Auto-fetched 9 hours ago.

Windmill

Powerful, self-hosted platform for building and running workflows, scripts, and apps with code-first approach and collaborative features.

Visit Windmill Read more

Stars
16,459
Forks
954
Last commit
10 hours ago
Repository age
4 years
Self-hosted
Yes

View Repository

Auto-fetched 9 hours ago.

Detailed Comparison

Temporal appears to have several advantages over Windmill, particularly in maturity and licensing. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.

Comparable

Community & Popularity

Both tools have similar popularity levels, with Temporal having 20,177 stars and Windmill having 16,459 stars on GitHub. In terms of developer contributions, Temporal has 1,574 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.

Comparable

Development Activity

Both projects show recent activity, with Temporal last updated 12 hours ago and Windmill 10 hours ago.

Comparable

Technology Stack

Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with Bash, Golang. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Windmill leverages JavaScript, CSS, Typescript, Python, Rust, C, Objective-C, SvelteKit.

Temporal wins

Project Maturity

Temporal has been in development longer, starting 7 years ago, compared to Windmill which began 4 years ago. This 2.6-year head start suggests Temporal may have more mature features and established processes.

Temporal wins

Licensing

Temporal is licensed under MIT, while Windmill's license terms are not publicly specified.

Comparable

Use Cases & Features

Both tools serve similar use cases in Workflow Orchestration. However, they also have distinct specializations: Windmill extends into PaaS & Deployment Tools, Workflow Automation.

Comparable