ScreenVivid vs ShareX
Learn how ScreenVivid and ShareX differ in their key features, development activity, technology
stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these screen recording tools is best for you.
Learn how ScreenVivid and ShareX differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these screen recording tools is best for you.
ScreenVivid
Stars
165Forks
17Last commit
4 months agoRepository age
2 yearsLicense
MIT
Warning: This project hasn't been updated in 4 months and might not be actively maintained anymore.
Auto-fetched .
ShareX
Stars
37,407Forks
3,732Last commit
17 hours agoRepository age
13 yearsLicense
GPL-3.0
Auto-fetched .
Detailed Comparison
ShareX appears to have several advantages over ScreenVivid, particularly in popularity, activity and maturity. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
ShareX appears to have several advantages over ScreenVivid, particularly in popularity, activity and maturity. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Community & Popularity
ShareX significantly outpaces ScreenVivid in community adoption with 37,407 stars compared to 165 stars on GitHub. This 226.7x difference suggests ShareX has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, ShareX has 3,732 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Development Activity
ShareX shows more recent development activity with its last commit 17 hours ago, while ScreenVivid was last updated 4 months ago. This suggests ShareX is being more actively maintained.
Technology Stack
ScreenVivid uses Bash, Python while ShareX leverages CSS, C#.
Project Maturity
ShareX has been in development longer, starting 13 years ago, compared to ScreenVivid which began 2 years ago. This 11.1-year head start suggests ShareX may have more mature features and established processes.
Licensing
ScreenVivid uses the MIT license, which is more permissive than ShareX's GPL-3.0 license, potentially offering greater flexibility for commercial use and integration.
Use Cases & Features
Both tools serve similar use cases in Screen Recording. However, they also have distinct specializations: ShareX extends into Screenshot Utilities.
c15t – Open-source cookie banner, built for control and lightening fast modern web apps.