Cap vs ScreenVivid
Learn how Cap and ScreenVivid differ in their key features, development activity, technology
stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these screen recording tools is best for you.
Learn how Cap and ScreenVivid differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these screen recording tools is best for you.
Cap
Auto-fetched .
ScreenVivid
Stars
165Forks
17Last commit
4 months agoRepository age
2 yearsLicense
MIT
Warning: This project hasn't been updated in 4 months and might not be actively maintained anymore.
Auto-fetched .
Detailed Comparison
Cap appears to have several advantages over ScreenVivid, particularly in popularity, activity and features. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Cap appears to have several advantages over ScreenVivid, particularly in popularity, activity and features. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Community & Popularity
Cap significantly outpaces ScreenVivid in community adoption with 18,786 stars compared to 165 stars on GitHub. This 113.9x difference suggests Cap has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Cap has 1,493 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Development Activity
Cap shows more recent development activity with its last commit 1 day ago, while ScreenVivid was last updated 4 months ago. This suggests Cap is being more actively maintained.
Technology Stack
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with Bash. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Cap uses JavaScript, CSS, Typescript, JSX, Next.js, Rust, Tauri while ScreenVivid leverages Python.
Project Maturity
Both projects started around the same time, with Cap beginning 2 years ago and ScreenVivid 2 years ago.
Licensing
ScreenVivid uses the MIT license, which is more permissive than Cap's AGPL-3.0 license, potentially offering greater flexibility for commercial use and integration.
Use Cases & Features
Both tools serve similar use cases in Screen Recording.
Hosting & Deployment
Cap provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while ScreenVivid may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.
InfluxData – The time series database built for high-speed ingestion and real-time queries. Download InfluxDB for free.