Learn how Macro CRM and Odoo differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these crm systems is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Repository

Last 30 days

Both Macro CRM and Odoo have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Odoo significantly outpaces Macro CRM in community adoption with 54,261 stars compared to 4,268 stars on GitHub. This 12.7x difference suggests Odoo has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Odoo has 33,659 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Macro CRM is growing faster, adding 3,218 stars in the last 30 days (+306%) against adding 607 stars for Odoo (+1.1%). Macro CRM is the smaller project of the two, so it is closing the gap rather than extending a lead.
Both projects show recent activity, with Macro CRM last updated 17 hours ago and Odoo 11 hours ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Bash, Python. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Macro CRM uses Typescript, JSX, C, Rust, Objective-C, Swift, Kotlin, Tauri.
Odoo has been in development longer, starting 12 years ago, compared to Macro CRM which began 10 months ago. This 11.7-year head start suggests Odoo may have more mature features and established processes.
Macro CRM is licensed under AGPL-3.0, while Odoo's license terms are not publicly specified.
Both tools serve similar use cases in CRM Systems. However, they also have distinct specializations: Odoo extends into ERP Systems.
Odoo provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while Macro CRM may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs