Learn how LobeChat and Open WebUI differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these ai chat interfaces is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
7 hours agoRepository age
3 yearsVersion
v2.2.21Self-hosted
YesRepository
lobehub/lobehub
Last 30 days
Last commit
7 hours agoRepository age
3 yearsVersion
v0.12.5License
BSD-3-ClauseSelf-hosted
YesRepository
open-webui
Open WebUI appears to have several advantages over LobeChat, particularly in popularity, growth and licensing. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Open WebUI leads in popularity with 157,269 stars vs 83,612 stars for LobeChat. The 88% higher star count indicates stronger community adoption. In terms of developer contributions, Open WebUI has 22,880 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Open WebUI is growing faster, adding 3,625 stars in the last 30 days (+2.4%) against adding 684 stars for LobeChat (+0.8%). Open WebUI is both larger and pulling further ahead.
Both projects show recent activity, with LobeChat last updated 7 hours ago and Open WebUI 7 hours ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Bash, Typescript. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: LobeChat uses JSX, Next.js while Open WebUI leverages Python, SvelteKit.
Both projects started around the same time, with LobeChat beginning 3 years ago and Open WebUI 3 years ago.
Open WebUI is licensed under BSD-3-Clause, while LobeChat's license terms are not publicly specified.
Both tools serve similar use cases in AI Chat Interfaces. However, they also have distinct specializations: LobeChat also focuses on AI Agent Platforms.
Both LobeChat and Open WebUI offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs