Logto – Modern auth infrastructure for developers. Add multi-tenancy, enterprise SSO, and RBAC to your SaaS or AI apps.Learn how LobeChat and Open WebUI differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these ai chat interfaces is best for you.
Open WebUI appears to have several advantages over LobeChat, particularly in popularity, licensing and features. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Open WebUI leads in popularity with 148,348 stars vs 81,461 stars for LobeChat. The 82% higher star count indicates stronger community adoption. In terms of developer contributions, Open WebUI has 21,594 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Both projects show recent activity, with LobeChat last updated 11 hours ago and Open WebUI 17 hours ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Bash, Typescript. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: LobeChat uses JSX, Next.js while Open WebUI leverages Python, SvelteKit.
Both projects started around the same time, with LobeChat beginning 3 years ago and Open WebUI 3 years ago.
Open WebUI is licensed under BSD-3-Clause, while LobeChat's license terms are not publicly specified.
Both tools serve similar use cases in AI Chat Interfaces. However, they also have distinct specializations: LobeChat also focuses on AI Agent Platforms.
Open WebUI provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while LobeChat may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.
LobeChatvs
LibreChatActivity score
Stars
Forks
Last commit
Activity score
Stars
Forks
Last commit
Repository age
Repository age
Version
Repository
License
Self-hosted
Repository
