Learn how LobeChat and Open WebUI differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these ai chat interfaces is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
Self-hosted
Repository

Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Open WebUI appears to have several advantages over LobeChat, particularly in popularity, growth and licensing. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Open WebUI leads in popularity with 150,419 stars vs 82,102 stars for LobeChat. The 83% higher star count indicates stronger community adoption. In terms of developer contributions, Open WebUI has 21,957 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Open WebUI is growing faster, adding 2,948 stars in the last 30 days (+2%) against adding 1,099 stars for LobeChat (+1.4%). Open WebUI is both larger and pulling further ahead.
Both projects show recent activity, with LobeChat last updated 5 hours ago and Open WebUI 6 hours ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Bash, Typescript. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: LobeChat uses JSX, Next.js while Open WebUI leverages Python, SvelteKit.
Both projects started around the same time, with LobeChat beginning 3 years ago and Open WebUI 3 years ago.
Open WebUI is licensed under BSD-3-Clause, while LobeChat's license terms are not publicly specified.
Both tools serve similar use cases in AI Chat Interfaces. However, they also have distinct specializations: LobeChat also focuses on AI Agent Platforms.
Both LobeChat and Open WebUI offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs