Learn how Fullmoon and Open WebUI differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these ai chat interfaces is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Repository

Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Open WebUI appears to have several advantages over Fullmoon, particularly in popularity, growth, activity, maturity and features. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Open WebUI significantly outpaces Fullmoon in community adoption with 149,882 stars compared to 2,267 stars on GitHub. This 66.1x difference suggests Open WebUI has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Open WebUI has 21,869 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Open WebUI is growing faster, adding 3,077 stars in the last 30 days (+2.1%) against losing 3 stars for Fullmoon (-0.1%). Open WebUI is both larger and pulling further ahead.
Open WebUI shows more recent development activity with its last commit 10 hours ago, while Fullmoon was last updated 1 year ago. This suggests Open WebUI is being more actively maintained.
Fullmoon uses Swift while Open WebUI leverages JavaScript, CSS, Bash, Typescript, Python, SvelteKit.
Open WebUI has been in development longer, starting 3 years ago, compared to Fullmoon which began 2 years ago. This 1.0-year head start suggests Open WebUI may have more mature features and established processes.
The projects use different licenses: Fullmoon is licensed under MIT while Open WebUI uses BSD-3-Clause. Consider the licensing requirements when choosing for your project.
Both tools serve similar use cases in AI Chat Interfaces.
Open WebUI provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while Fullmoon may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.