Inngest vs Trigger
Learn how Inngest and Trigger differ in their key features, development activity, technology
stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these durable execution tools is best for you.
Learn how Inngest and Trigger differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these durable execution tools is best for you.
Inngest
Last 30 days
Last commit
1 day agoRepository age
5 yearsVersion
v1.44.0License
SSPL-1.0Self-hosted
YesRepository
inngest/inngest
Trigger
Last 30 days
Last commit
24 hours agoRepository age
4 yearsVersion
v4.5.16License
Apache-2.0Repository
triggerdotdev/trigger.dev
Detailed Comparison
Both Inngest and Trigger have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Both Inngest and Trigger have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Community & Popularity
Trigger leads in popularity with 16,215 stars vs 5,808 stars for Inngest. The 179% higher star count indicates stronger community adoption. In terms of developer contributions, Trigger has 1,436 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Growth Momentum
Inngest and Trigger are moving at much the same rate, adding 114 stars and adding 288 stars respectively over the last 30 days (+2% vs +1.8%). Neither is pulling away from the other on momentum alone.
Development Activity
Both projects show recent activity, with Inngest last updated 1 day ago and Trigger 24 hours ago.
Technology Stack
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Bash, Typescript, JSX, Next.js. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Inngest uses Golang, Lua while Trigger leverages Python, Remix.
Project Maturity
Inngest has been in development longer, starting 5 years ago, compared to Trigger which began 4 years ago. This 1.5-year head start suggests Inngest may have more mature features and established processes.
Licensing
The projects use different licenses: Inngest is licensed under SSPL-1.0 while Trigger uses Apache-2.0. Consider the licensing requirements when choosing for your project.
Use Cases & Features
Both tools serve similar use cases in Durable Execution.
Hosting & Deployment
Inngest provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while Trigger may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.
ScreenshotOne – The screenshot API for developers. Render screenshots in one simple API call