Learn how Infinite and Metabase differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these data visualization tools is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
Self-hosted
Repository

Metabase appears to have several advantages over Infinite, particularly in popularity, activity and maturity. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Metabase significantly outpaces Infinite in community adoption with 48,887 stars compared to 15 stars on GitHub. This 3259.1x difference suggests Metabase has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Metabase has 6,767 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Metabase shows more recent development activity with its last commit 13 hours ago, while Infinite was last updated 2 months ago. This suggests Metabase is being more actively maintained.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, Bash, Typescript, JSX. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Infinite uses Next.js while Metabase leverages CSS, Clojure.
Metabase has been in development longer, starting 12 years ago, compared to Infinite which began 2 months ago. This 11.5-year head start suggests Metabase may have more mature features and established processes.
Infinite is licensed under MIT, while Metabase's license terms are not publicly specified.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Data Visualization, BI Platforms.
Both Infinite and Metabase offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs