Learn how Happy and Termio differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these ai coding agent orchestrators is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
7 hours agoRepository age
1 yearVersion
1.2.5License
MITSelf-hosted
YesRepository
slopus/happy
Last 30 days
Last commit
8 hours agoRepository age
5 monthsVersion
v0.65.0License
MITRepository
termio-sh/termio
Both Happy and Termio have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Happy significantly outpaces Termio in community adoption with 24,319 stars compared to 584 stars on GitHub. This 41.6x difference suggests Happy has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Happy has 2,086 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Termio is growing faster, adding 55 stars in the last 30 days (+10%) against adding 100 stars for Happy (+0.4%). Termio is the smaller project of the two, so it is closing the gap rather than extending a lead.
Both projects show recent activity, with Happy last updated 7 hours ago and Termio 8 hours ago.
Both projects started around the same time, with Happy beginning 1 year ago and Termio 5 months ago.
Both projects use the MIT license, providing identical terms for usage and distribution.
Both tools serve similar use cases in AI Coding Agent Orchestrators.
Happy provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while Termio may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.