Learn how Happy and Orca differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these ai coding agent orchestrators is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
13 hours agoRepository age
1 yearVersion
1.2.5License
MITSelf-hosted
YesRepository
slopus/happy
Last 30 days
Last commit
12 hours agoRepository age
7 monthsVersion
v1.4.240License
MITRepository
stablyai/orca
Both Happy and Orca have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Orca significantly outpaces Happy in community adoption with 105,166 stars compared to 24,302 stars on GitHub. This 4.3x difference suggests Orca has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Orca has 6,645 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Orca is growing faster, adding 26,962 stars in the last 30 days (+34%) against adding 83 stars for Happy (+0.3%). Orca is both larger and pulling further ahead.
Both projects show recent activity, with Happy last updated 13 hours ago and Orca 12 hours ago.
Both projects started around the same time, with Happy beginning 1 year ago and Orca 7 months ago.
Both projects use the MIT license, providing identical terms for usage and distribution.
Both tools serve similar use cases in AI Coding Agent Orchestrators.
Happy provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while Orca may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.