Happy vs Paseo
Learn how Happy and Paseo differ in their key features, development activity, technology
stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these ai coding agent orchestrators is best for you.
Learn how Happy and Paseo differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these ai coding agent orchestrators is best for you.
Happy
Last 30 days
Last commit
16 hours agoRepository age
1 yearVersion
1.2.5License
MITSelf-hosted
YesRepository
slopus/happy
Paseo
Last 30 days
Last commit
4 hours agoRepository age
1 yearVersion
v0.15.4License
Apache-2.0Self-hosted
YesRepository
getpaseo/paseo
Detailed Comparison
Both Happy and Paseo have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Both Happy and Paseo have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Community & Popularity
Both Happy and Paseo show comparable community engagement with 24,640 and 24,060 stars respectively. In terms of developer contributions, Paseo has 2,958 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Growth Momentum
Paseo is growing faster, adding 3,068 stars in the last 30 days (+15%) against adding 421 stars for Happy (+1.7%). Paseo is the smaller project of the two, so it is closing the gap rather than extending a lead.
Development Activity
Both projects show recent activity, with Happy last updated 16 hours ago and Paseo 4 hours ago.
Technology Stack
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Bash, Typescript, JSX, Swift, Ruby, Kotlin. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Happy uses Python, Golang, SCSS, Rust, C, Objective-C, PHP, Java, C++, Tauri, MATLAB, C#, Perl, Lua, Elixir, Dart, Zig, R, Haskell, Scala while Paseo leverages Tanstack Start.
Project Maturity
Both projects started around the same time, with Happy beginning 1 year ago and Paseo 1 year ago.
Licensing
Happy uses the MIT license, which is more permissive than Paseo's Apache-2.0 license, potentially offering greater flexibility for commercial use and integration.
Use Cases & Features
Both tools serve similar use cases in AI Coding Agent Orchestrators.
Hosting & Deployment
Both Happy and Paseo offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.
Bright Data – Web data for AI agents and apps. Built-in unblocking, proxies, and ready-made APIs.