What is the main difference between Happy and Paseo?

Happy and Paseo are both ai coding agent orchestrators but differ in their approach, features, and target audience. Compare their GitHub stats, technology stack, and community adoption to make the best choice.

Which is better: Happy or Paseo?

The choice between Happy and Paseo depends on your specific needs, technical requirements, and team preferences. Both are quality open source solutions with active communities.

Can I migrate from Happy to Paseo?

Migration between Happy and Paseo is possible but requires careful planning. Consider data export/import capabilities, feature parity, and potential workflow changes.

Openlane – Open-source, developer-first platform for automated compliance, risk management, and built-in Trust Center.

Learn more

Happy vs Paseo

Learn how Happy and Paseo differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these ai coding agent orchestrators is best for you.

Happy

Orchestrates Claude Code, Codex, and Grok through a single desktop and mobile app, reusing the AI subscriptions you already pay for.

Visit Happy Read more

24,302stars+83(+0.3%)

Last 30 days

Last commit
13 hours ago
Repository age
1 year
Version
1.2.5
License
MIT
Self-hosted
Yes
Repository
slopus/happy

Paseo

Self-hosted orchestrator for coding agents like Claude Code, Codex, and Cursor, controlled from phone, desktop, web, or CLI.

Visit Paseo Read more

21,913stars+3,354(+18%)

Last 30 days

Last commit
18 hours ago
Repository age
1 year
Version
v0.13.0
License
Apache-2.0
Self-hosted
Yes
Repository
getpaseo/paseo

Detailed Comparison

Both Happy and Paseo have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.

Comparable

Community & Popularity

Both tools have similar popularity levels, with Happy having 24,302 stars and Paseo having 21,913 stars on GitHub. In terms of developer contributions, Paseo has 2,644 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.

Paseo wins

Growth Momentum

Paseo is growing faster, adding 3,354 stars in the last 30 days (+18%) against adding 83 stars for Happy (+0.3%). Paseo is the smaller project of the two, so it is closing the gap rather than extending a lead.

Comparable

Development Activity

Both projects show recent activity, with Happy last updated 13 hours ago and Paseo 18 hours ago.

Comparable

Project Maturity

Both projects started around the same time, with Happy beginning 1 year ago and Paseo 1 year ago.

Happy wins

Licensing

Happy uses the MIT license, which is more permissive than Paseo's Apache-2.0 license, potentially offering greater flexibility for commercial use and integration.

Comparable