Learn how Orchestrator.inc and Paseo differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these ai coding agent orchestrators is best for you.
Stars
14,197+0.2%Last commit
9 hours agoRepository age
9 monthsVersion
v0.14.10License
Apache-2.0Self-hosted
YesRepository
agent-orchestrator
Last 30 days
Last commit
10 hours agoRepository age
1 yearVersion
v0.15.3License
Apache-2.0Self-hosted
YesRepository
getpaseo/paseo
Paseo appears to have several advantages over Orchestrator.inc, particularly in popularity and growth. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Paseo leads in popularity with 23,351 stars vs 14,197 stars for Orchestrator.inc. The 64% higher star count indicates stronger community adoption. In terms of developer contributions, Paseo has 2,865 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Paseo is growing faster, adding 3,204 stars in the last 30 days (+16%) against adding 22 stars for Orchestrator.inc (+0.2%). Paseo is both larger and pulling further ahead.
Both projects show recent activity, with Orchestrator.inc last updated 9 hours ago and Paseo 10 hours ago.
Both projects started around the same time, with Orchestrator.inc beginning 9 months ago and Paseo 1 year ago.
Both projects use the Apache-2.0 license, providing identical terms for usage and distribution.
Both tools serve similar use cases in AI Coding Agent Orchestrators.
Both Orchestrator.inc and Paseo offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs