Learn how Orca and Paseo differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these ai coding agent orchestrators is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Repository

Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Orca appears to have several advantages over Paseo, particularly in popularity, growth and licensing. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Orca significantly outpaces Paseo in community adoption with 50,825 stars compared to 14,582 stars on GitHub. This 3.5x difference suggests Orca has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Orca has 3,508 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Orca is growing faster, adding 23,666 stars in the last 30 days (+87%) against adding 1,229 stars for Paseo (+9.2%). Orca is both larger and pulling further ahead.
Both projects show recent activity, with Orca last updated 10 hours ago and Paseo 16 hours ago.
Both projects started around the same time, with Orca beginning 5 months ago and Paseo 10 months ago.
Orca uses the MIT license, which is more permissive than Paseo's AGPL-3.0 license, potentially offering greater flexibility for commercial use and integration.
Both tools serve similar use cases in AI Coding Agent Orchestrators.
Paseo provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while Orca may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.