What is the main difference between Orca and Paseo?

Orca and Paseo are both ai coding agent orchestrators but differ in their approach, features, and target audience. Compare their GitHub stats, technology stack, and community adoption to make the best choice.

Which is better: Orca or Paseo?

The choice between Orca and Paseo depends on your specific needs, technical requirements, and team preferences. Both are quality open source solutions with active communities.

Can I migrate from Orca to Paseo?

Migration between Orca and Paseo is possible but requires careful planning. Consider data export/import capabilities, feature parity, and potential workflow changes.

Windshift – The self-hosted platform that replaces Jira.

Learn more

Orca vs Paseo

Learn how Orca and Paseo differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these ai coding agent orchestrators is best for you.

Orca

Agent Development Environment that runs Claude Code, Codex, Gemini, and other CLI agents in parallel across isolated git worktrees, with terminals, browser, diff review, and git tools built in.

Visit Orca Read more

103,668stars+27,188(+36%)

Last 30 days

Last commit
7 hours ago
Repository age
7 months
Version
v1.4.237
License
MIT
Repository
stablyai/orca

Paseo

Self-hosted orchestrator for coding agents like Claude Code, Codex, and Cursor, controlled from phone, desktop, web, or CLI.

Visit Paseo Read more

21,807stars+3,632(+20%)

Last 30 days

Last commit
8 hours ago
Repository age
1 year
Version
v0.12.0
License
Apache-2.0
Self-hosted
Yes
Repository
getpaseo/paseo

Detailed Comparison

Orca appears to have several advantages over Paseo, particularly in popularity, growth and licensing. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.

Orca wins

Community & Popularity

Orca significantly outpaces Paseo in community adoption with 103,668 stars compared to 21,807 stars on GitHub. This 4.8x difference suggests Orca has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Orca has 6,546 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.

Orca wins

Growth Momentum

Orca is growing faster, adding 27,188 stars in the last 30 days (+36%) against adding 3,632 stars for Paseo (+20%). Orca is both larger and pulling further ahead.

Comparable

Development Activity

Both projects show recent activity, with Orca last updated 7 hours ago and Paseo 8 hours ago.

Comparable

Technology Stack

Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Bash, Typescript, JSX, Swift, Ruby, Kotlin. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Orca uses Python while Paseo leverages Tanstack Start.

Comparable

Project Maturity

Both projects started around the same time, with Orca beginning 7 months ago and Paseo 1 year ago.

Orca wins

Licensing

Orca uses the MIT license, which is more permissive than Paseo's Apache-2.0 license, potentially offering greater flexibility for commercial use and integration.

Comparable

Use Cases & Features

Both tools serve similar use cases in AI Coding Agent Orchestrators.

Paseo wins

Hosting & Deployment

Paseo provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while Orca may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.

Other tool comparisons to consider