Learn how Happy and Jean differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these ai coding agent orchestrators is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
16 hours agoRepository age
1 yearVersion
1.2.5License
MITSelf-hosted
YesRepository
slopus/happy
Last 30 days
Last commit
2 days agoRepository age
10 monthsVersion
v1.0.15License
Apache-2.0Self-hosted
YesRepository
coollabsio/jean
Both Happy and Jean have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Happy significantly outpaces Jean in community adoption with 24,640 stars compared to 1,418 stars on GitHub. This 17.4x difference suggests Happy has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Happy has 2,120 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Jean is growing faster, adding 87 stars in the last 30 days (+6.5%) against adding 421 stars for Happy (+1.7%). Jean is the smaller project of the two, so it is closing the gap rather than extending a lead.
Both projects show recent activity, with Happy last updated 16 hours ago and Jean 2 days ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Bash, Typescript, JSX, Rust, Tauri. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Happy uses Python, Golang, SCSS, C, Objective-C, PHP, Java, Swift, C++, Ruby, Kotlin, MATLAB, C#, Perl, Lua, Elixir, Dart, Zig, R, Haskell, Scala.
Both projects started around the same time, with Happy beginning 1 year ago and Jean 10 months ago.
Happy uses the MIT license, which is more permissive than Jean's Apache-2.0 license, potentially offering greater flexibility for commercial use and integration.
Both tools serve similar use cases in AI Coding Agent Orchestrators.
Both Happy and Jean offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.