Ad
Learn more

Happy vs Jean

Learn how Happy and Jean differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these ai coding agent orchestrators is best for you.

vs

Happy

AI
Orchestrates Claude Code, Codex, and Grok through a single desktop and mobile app, reusing the AI subscriptions you already pay for.
24,640stars+421(+1.7%)

Last 30 days

  • Last commit

    16 hours ago
  • Repository age

    1 year
  • Version

    1.2.5
  • License

    MIT
  • Self-hosted

    Yes
  • Repository

    slopus/happy
Screenshot of Happy

Jean

AI
Run multiple AI coding agents in isolated Git worktrees, with cross-repo context, GitHub/Linear integrations, and support for Claude, Codex, Cursor, and more.
1,418stars+87(+6.5%)

Last 30 days

Screenshot of Jean

Detailed Comparison

Both Happy and Jean have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.

Happy wins
Community & Popularity

Happy significantly outpaces Jean in community adoption with 24,640 stars compared to 1,418 stars on GitHub. This 17.4x difference suggests Happy has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Happy has 2,120 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.

Jean wins
Growth Momentum

Jean is growing faster, adding 87 stars in the last 30 days (+6.5%) against adding 421 stars for Happy (+1.7%). Jean is the smaller project of the two, so it is closing the gap rather than extending a lead.

Comparable
Development Activity

Both projects show recent activity, with Happy last updated 16 hours ago and Jean 2 days ago.

Comparable
Technology Stack

Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Bash, Typescript, JSX, Rust, Tauri. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Happy uses Python, Golang, SCSS, C, Objective-C, PHP, Java, Swift, C++, Ruby, Kotlin, MATLAB, C#, Perl, Lua, Elixir, Dart, Zig, R, Haskell, Scala.

Comparable
Project Maturity

Both projects started around the same time, with Happy beginning 1 year ago and Jean 10 months ago.

Happy wins
Licensing

Happy uses the MIT license, which is more permissive than Jean's Apache-2.0 license, potentially offering greater flexibility for commercial use and integration.

Comparable
Use Cases & Features

Both tools serve similar use cases in AI Coding Agent Orchestrators.

Comparable
Hosting & Deployment

Both Happy and Jean offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.