Learn how Happy and Jean differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these ai coding agent orchestrators is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
13 hours agoRepository age
1 yearVersion
1.2.5License
MITSelf-hosted
YesRepository
slopus/happy
Last 30 days
Last commit
21 hours agoRepository age
9 monthsVersion
v1.0.12License
Apache-2.0Self-hosted
YesRepository
coollabsio/jean
Both Happy and Jean have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Happy significantly outpaces Jean in community adoption with 24,302 stars compared to 1,360 stars on GitHub. This 17.9x difference suggests Happy has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Happy has 2,083 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Jean is growing faster, adding 67 stars in the last 30 days (+5.2%) against adding 83 stars for Happy (+0.3%). Jean is the smaller project of the two, so it is closing the gap rather than extending a lead.
Both projects show recent activity, with Happy last updated 13 hours ago and Jean 21 hours ago.
Both projects started around the same time, with Happy beginning 1 year ago and Jean 9 months ago.
Happy uses the MIT license, which is more permissive than Jean's Apache-2.0 license, potentially offering greater flexibility for commercial use and integration.
Both tools serve similar use cases in AI Coding Agent Orchestrators.
Both Happy and Jean offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.