Learn how Paseo and Termio differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these ai coding agent orchestrators is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
7 hours agoRepository age
1 yearVersion
v0.13.1License
Apache-2.0Self-hosted
YesRepository
getpaseo/paseo
Last 30 days
Last commit
8 hours agoRepository age
5 monthsVersion
v0.65.0License
MITRepository
termio-sh/termio
Paseo appears to have several advantages over Termio, particularly in popularity, growth and features. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Paseo significantly outpaces Termio in community adoption with 22,052 stars compared to 584 stars on GitHub. This 37.8x difference suggests Paseo has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Paseo has 2,662 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Paseo is growing faster, adding 3,432 stars in the last 30 days (+18%) against adding 55 stars for Termio (+10%). Paseo is both larger and pulling further ahead.
Both projects show recent activity, with Paseo last updated 7 hours ago and Termio 8 hours ago.
Both projects started around the same time, with Paseo beginning 1 year ago and Termio 5 months ago.
Termio uses the MIT license, which is more permissive than Paseo's Apache-2.0 license, potentially offering greater flexibility for commercial use and integration.
Both tools serve similar use cases in AI Coding Agent Orchestrators.
Paseo provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while Termio may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.