Learn how Happy and Superset differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these ai coding agent orchestrators is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
13 hours agoRepository age
1 yearVersion
1.2.5License
MITSelf-hosted
YesRepository
slopus/happy
Last 30 days
Last commit
16 hours agoRepository age
1 yearVersion
v1.40.0License
Elastic-2.0Repository
superset-sh/superset
Happy appears to have several advantages over Superset, particularly in popularity, licensing and features. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Happy leads in popularity with 24,302 stars vs 15,530 stars for Superset. The 56% higher star count indicates stronger community adoption. In terms of developer contributions, Happy has 2,083 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Superset is growing faster, adding 894 stars in the last 30 days (+6.1%) against adding 83 stars for Happy (+0.3%). Superset is the smaller project of the two, so it is closing the gap rather than extending a lead.
Both projects show recent activity, with Happy last updated 13 hours ago and Superset 16 hours ago.
Both projects started around the same time, with Happy beginning 1 year ago and Superset 1 year ago.
Happy uses the MIT license, which is more permissive than Superset's Elastic-2.0 license, potentially offering greater flexibility for commercial use and integration.
Both tools serve similar use cases in AI Coding Agent Orchestrators.
Happy provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while Superset may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.