Learn how Goose and OpenCode differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these ai coding agents is best for you.
Stars
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Repository

OpenCode appears to have several advantages over Goose, particularly in popularity, growth and licensing. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
OpenCode significantly outpaces Goose in community adoption with 210,706 stars compared to 54,756 stars on GitHub. This 3.8x difference suggests OpenCode has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, OpenCode has 27,894 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
OpenCode is growing faster, adding 8,160 stars in the last 30 days (+4%) against adding 137 stars for Goose (+0.3%). OpenCode is both larger and pulling further ahead.
Both projects show recent activity, with Goose last updated 15 hours ago and OpenCode 11 hours ago.
Both projects started around the same time, with Goose beginning 2 years ago and OpenCode 1 year ago.
OpenCode uses the MIT license, which is more permissive than Goose's Apache-2.0 license, potentially offering greater flexibility for commercial use and integration.
Both tools serve similar use cases in AI Coding Agents. However, they also have distinct specializations: Goose also focuses on AI Agent Platforms.
Goose provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while OpenCode may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.